Оlena Коrzun

Оlena Коrzun

ORCID: 0000-0003-2869-9549

DOI: 10.17721/2522–4611.2020.41.11



Abstract: Some scientists as well as some property of the Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR stayed in the occupied by fascists Kiev because of bad evacuation measures taken by the Soviet authorities. In order to accelerate the development of the occupied territories, the German authorities used the remaining human and material resources of the Institute. During the reorganization of the Ukrainian research institutions carried out by the Nazis, the Institute of Botany changed its name from the Institute of Botany of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences to the Institute of Agricultural Botany and the Regional Institute of Agricultural Botany.

The purpose of the study is based on archival sources, using historical and chronological, biographical, prosopographical, socio-cultural research methods in order to find out the process of organization, results of activities, personnel of the regional Institute of Agricultural Botany, which operated during the German occupation of 1941-1943 in the city of Kiev. It has been found out that in the late autumn of 1941 the material and technical base of the institution was prevented from destruction, which enabled the local authorities to announce the continuation of the institution's activities under the supervision of the newly formed Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (UAS). The Institute at that time employed 20 staff members in 5 departments. The scientists continued the scientific theme, started in the prewar period. It is proved that after the dissolution of the UAS, the Institute subordinated to The Center for Agricultural Research, that coordinated agricultural experimental work in the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine». The scientific research of the institution is confined to applied issues related to the study of agricultural crops. During the next stage of reorganization of the organizational component of Ukrainian science, which lasted from June to September 1942, the Institute received the status of «Regional», which meant its final integration into the German structure of science management.

During 1942-1943. The regional Institute of Agricultural Botany (CSGB) had the staff of 40 employees. They prepared a volume about the Ukrainian flora in German and Ukrainian, focusing on agricultural and technical plants; maps of vegetation of Ukraine; continued the study of economic and biological properties of agricultural crops, focusing more on the culture of Kok-Sagiz. On the basis of the Institute on June 4-6, 1942, the first during the occupation scientific conference was held with participation of 120 agricultural specialists. The scientists of the Institute worked closely with other Ukrainian research institutes of agricultural sphere, taking part in conferences and expeditions.

It was found that Ukrainian scientists were forced to cooperate with German scientists, who were an instrument of Nazi policy in Ukraine. Working at this time within the walls of scientific institutions, performing scientific tasks of German specialists, providing them with scientific advice, Ukrainian botanists sought to survive under the harsh conditions of the occupation regime, trying to save their lives, continue their scientific research and the like. It is specified that the Ukrainian botanists were forced to carry out orders of the German management and to accompany property of Institute during its exportation by Nazis from the Ukrainian lands. The author provides the names of the emigrant-researchers of the Institute and the reasons for their departure. Stages of repatriation of the Institute's property are traced.

Thus, with the aim of the fastest possible development of the occupied territories and feeling the lack of its own scientific forces, the occupant authorities used the scientific potential of the Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, limiting its activities only to the agricultural needs and turning it into the Regional Institute of Agricultural Botany. However, it enabled to continue the development of botanical science on the Ukrainian lands, though already in other political realities. In the stern conditions of the occupation policy the research institutions managed not only to survive, but also retained their material and technical base, continued the research commenced in the pre-war period, which enabled them to quickly resume the work in the postwar period. The proposed recommendations and practical advice on the development of agricultural crops have become further significant contribution to the revival of the agricultural sector of the USSR. All this taken into account, we consider the activities of the Regional Institute of agricultural botany as a dignified page in the history of Botanical and agricultural science of Ukraine.

Keywords: science, agricultural research, World War II, The German occupation of 1941-1943, The Reichskommissariat «Ukraine», botany, The Institute of Botany, The Institute of Agricultural Botany, The Regional Institute of Agricultural botany, The Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Received by the editorial board: 2.12.2019


  1. Deutsche Forschungsstätten im Dienste der Nahrungsfreiheit. [German Research Institutes serving Freedom of Eating]. Ein Handbuch. Hanns Piegler (ed.), Neudamm: Neumann, 1940, 486 s. [in German].

  2. Walter H. Bekenntnisse eines Ökologen : Erlebtes in 8 Jahrzehnten u. auf Forschungsreisen in allen Erdteilen. [Confessions of an ecologist: Experiences in 8 decades u. on research trips in all parts of the world.] Stuttgart : Fischer, 1980. 33 s. [in German].

  3. Walter H. Die Vegetation des europäischen Rußlands unter Berücksichtigung von Klima, Boden und wirtschaftlicher Nutzung. [The vegetation of European Russia taking into account climate, soil and economic use.] Berlin: Parey, 1942. 134 s. [in German].

  4. Verhunov V.A. Silʹsʹkohospodarsʹka doslidna sprava v Ukrayini vid zarodzhennya do akademichnoho isnuvannya: orhanizatsiynyy aspekt. [Agricultural Experimental Case in Ukraine from Beginning to Academic Existence: Organizational Aspect]. / NSAL, NAAS. Kyiv: Agrarian Science, 2012. 416 p. [in Ukrainian].

  5. H.Valʹter ta YU.Kleopov i H.Makhov – zabuti storinky vitchyznyanoyi nauky [G. Walter and Yu. Kleopov and G. Makhov - forgotten pages of the national science] / UAAS, SSAL; Structure: V. A. Vergunov, V. I. Melnyk. Simferopol: Tavrida, 2006, pp. 20-90 [in Ukrainian].

  6. Derzhavnyy arkhiv Kyyivsʹkoyi oblasti. F. R-2462. Op. 1. Spr. 6. Ark. 11 [in Ukrainian].

  7. Derzhavnyy arkhiv Khmelʹnytsʹkoyi oblasti. F. R-421. Op. 1. Spr. 4. Ark. 45-45 zv. [in Ukrainian].

  8. Dobrochayeva D. M. U poshukakh karty YU. D. Kleopova «Florystycheskoe rayonyrovanye Evrosybyry» [In search of a map by Yu. D. Cleopov "Floristic zoning of Eurosiberia"]. Ukrayinsʹkyy botanchnyy zhurnal. 1991. № 6 (48). S. 124-128 [in Ukrainian].

  9. Dobrochayeva D. M. Nove u naukoviy spadshchyni Yuriya Dmytrovycha Kleopova (1902-1943). [New in Yuriy Cleopov's Scientific Heritage (1902-1943)] Ukrayinsʹkyy botanichnyy zhurnal. 1995. № 2 (52). S. 288-305 [in Ukrainian].

  10. Instytut botaniky UAN. [Institute of Botany of UAS.] Ukrayinsʹke slovo. 1941. 30 lyst. [in Ukrainian].

  11. Istoriya Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi nauk Ukrayiny (1941-1945): Chastyna 1. Dokumenty i materialy. [History of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine (1941-1945): Part 1. Documents and materials] / NAS of Ukraine. V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine. Institute of Archival Studies, M. S. Hrushevsky Inst. Of Ukr. Archeography and Source Studies. Ed.: O. S. Onishchenko and others. Kyiv, 2007. 808 p. [in Ukrainian].

  12. Kleopov YU. D. Analyz flory shyrokolystvennykh lesov evropeyskoy chasty SSSR. [Analysis of flora of deciduous forests of the European part of the USSR]. K. : Nauk. Dumka, 1990. 352 s. [in Russian].

  13. Korzun O. V. Naukovo-doslidni silʹsʹkohospodarsʹki ustanovy Ukrayiny v period okupatsiyi pid chas Druhoyi svitovoyi viyny: zahalʹnyy ohlyad problemy. [Agricultural research institutions of Ukraine during the occupation in the World War II: a general overview of the problem.] Naukovi zapysky Vinnytsʹkoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho u-tu im. M. Kotsyubynsʹkoho. Vyp. 23 Seriya: Istoriya: Zbirnyk nauk. pratsʹ / zah. red. prof. O. A. Melʹnychuka. Vinnytsya: DP «Derzhavna kartohrafichna fabryka», 2015. S. 96-102 [in Ukrainian].

  14. Korzun O. V. Orhanizatsiya silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoyi doslidnoyi spravy na terytoriyi Raykhskomisariatu «Ukrayina». [Organization of Agricultural Research Case on the Territory of the Reich Commissariat Ukraine.] Chasopys ukrayinsʹkoyi istoriyi / za red. d-ra istor. nauk, profesora A. P. Kotsura. Kyyiv, 2019. Vyp. 4. S. 112-120 [in Ukrainian].

  15. Korzun O. Osoblyvosti evakuatsiyi silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh naukovo-doslidnykh ustanov ta yikh diyalʹnistʹ v roky Druhoyi svitovoyi viyny [Features of evacuation of agricultural research institutions and their activity during the Second World War.] Chasopys ukrayinsʹkoyi istoriyi. / za red. d. istor. n, prof. A. P. Kotsura. Kyyiv, 2014. Vyp. 30. S. 144-150 [in Ukrainian].

  16. Korzun O. V. Polityka Nimechchyny chasiv Tretʹoho Reykhu shchodo vyvchennya silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoho potentsialu ukrayinsʹkykh zemelʹ [The German policy of the Third Reich on the study of agricultural potential of Ukrainian lands] Virtus: Scientific Journal / Editor-in-Chief M.A. Zhurba. 2019. № 31 (February). S. 213-218 [in Ukrainian].

  17. Korzun O.V. Ukrayinsʹkyy naukovo-doslidnyy instytut zemlerobstva pid chas nimetsʹkoyi okupatsiyi v roky Druhoyi svitovoyi viyny. [Ukrainian Agricultural Research Institute during the German occupation during the Second World War.] Hileya: naukovyy visnyk. K. : «Vydavnytstvo «Hileya». 2019. Vyp. 143 (4). CH. 1. Istorychni nauky. S. 43-48 [in Ukrainian].

  18. Naukova sesiya Instytutu silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoyi botaniky. [Scientific session of the Institute of Agricultural Botany] Nove ukrayinsʹke slovo. 1942. 25 cherv. [in Ukrainian].

  19. Nimetsʹko-fashyst·sʹkyy okupatsiynyy rezhym na Ukrayini 1941-1944 rr.: zb. dok. i mater. [German-fascist occupation regime in Ukraine 1941-1944: coll. dock. and the mother.] / [pid red. F. Shevchenka]. K.: Derzhpolitvydav URSR. 1963. 488 s. [in Ukrainian].

  20. Prof[esor] YU. D. Kleopov (nekroloh).[Prof. YU. D. Cleopov (obituary).] Nove ukrayinsʹke slovo. 1943. 25 lyp. [in Ukrainian].

  21. Shevera M. V. Zabute imʺya ukrayinsʹkoho botanika Olʹhy Hustavivny Radde-Fominoyi (do 140-richchya vid dnya narodzhennya). [The Forgotten Name of Ukrainian Botanist Olga Radde-Fomin (up to 140th Birthday)] Ukrayinsʹkyy botanichnyy zhurnal. 2016. T. 73. № 4. S. 409-414 [in Ukrainian].

  22. Shevera M. V., Protopova V. V. Doslidnytsya flory Ukrayiny Yevheniya Tymofiyivna Polonsʹka: povernennya iz zabuttya. [Flora researcher of Ukraine Yevgeniy Polonsky: a return from oblivion.] Zhinka v nautsi ta osviti: mynule, suchasnistʹ, maybutnye : materialy 5-oyi Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. 3-5 lyst. 2011 r., m. Kyyiv. URL : http://www.botany.kiev.ua/doc/polonska.pdf (data zvernennya : 1.11.2019) [in Ukrainian].

  23. Shevera M. V. Fedoronchuk N. M. Kuzʹmychev A. Y. N. A. Desyatova-Shostenko : vozvrashchenye yz zabvenyya (k 125-letyyu so dnya rozhdenyya). [N. A. Desiatova-Shostenko: return from oblivion (to the 125th anniversary of his birth)] Samarskaya Luka: problemy rehyonalʹnoy y hlobalʹnoy ékolohyy. 2015. T. 24. № 1. S. 139-178. URL : http://www.ssc.smr.ru/media/journals /samluka/2015/24_1_09.pdf (data zvernennya 1.11.2019) [in Russian].

  24. YU. D. Kleopov ta suchasna botanichna nauka : materialy chytanʹ, prysvyach. 100-richchyu z dnya narodzh. YU. D. Kleopova [Yu. D. Cleopov and modern botanical science: materials of readings, dedications. 100th Birthday. Yu. D. Cleopov] / NAN Ukrayiny, In-t botaniky im. M. H. Kholodnoho, Ukr. fitosotsiol. tsentr, Ukr. botan. t-vo; holov. red. Yа. P. Didukh. K.: Fitosotsiotsentr. 2002. 414 s. [in Ukrainian].