47/1.Oleksandr Fedchuk

Oleksandr Fedchuk

PhD student, Faculty of History,

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-9003

DOI: 10.17721/2522-4611.2023.47.1

 POLITICAL CRYSIS IN THE CRIMEAN KHANATE FROM 1665 TO 1692

The article analyzes reasons, essence and consequences of political crisis in the Crimean Khanate from 1665 to 1692. That is the period between Budjakian revolt and third enthronement of Selim Geray. The research methodology is based on general scientific methods (rationality, analysis and synthesis of sources, induction and deduction) general historical (historical-genetic, empirical, historical-comperative, historical-typological, historical-systemic and statistical methods) and specially-historical (reconstruction, periodization, historical-synchronic and prosopographic methods). The scientific novelty of the research lies in distinguishing the period of crisis from the historical context of the Crimean Khanate, its periodization, determining the contribution of khans to overcome the crisis and finding out of its influence on Crimean history. In the middle of XVII century, the Crimean Chanate has briefly greatly expanded because of Tatars involving in the Khmelnycky insurrection. At the same time appeared social, political and economic collisions that induced permanent wars and disasters. These factors were the reason why Mehmed IV Geray, Adil Geray, Selim Geray, Murad Geray, Hacı ІІ Geray, Saadet ІІІ Geray and Safa Geray have been dethroned. The Crimean Khanate began to lose its power in Central and Eastern Europe. The state was torn apart between different political fractions. Khan’s reforms (contradicted each other) weren’t able to overcome the consequences of catastrophe. During the crisis period, Istanbul started to form the Crimean Khanate geopolitical paradigm, but Ottoman interests not always coincided with Crimean one another. Tatars participating in wars between Ottoman Empire, Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth and Holy Roman Empire didn’t allow concentrating effort on Muscovy confrontation. In the future, it will lead to fatal consequences. Finally, Selim Geray struggled to stabilize a situation in country by Ottomanisation and centralization. On the other hand, the Crimean Khanate never returned to pre-crisis indicators.

Key words: Crimean Khanate, Geray dynasty, political crisis, foreign policy, domestic policy.

Received by the editorial board: 23.12.2022 

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT

REFERENCES:

1. (1886). Arkhiv Aktov Yugo-zapadnoj Rossii izdavaemyj Vremennoj komissiej dlya razbora drevnikh aktov, sostoyashej pri kievskom, podolskom i volynskom general-gubernatore. [Archive of South West Russia Acts published by Temporary Commission of Southwestern Kraj]. Ch. 7. T. I. Akty o zaselenii Yugo-zapadnoj Rossii [Acts of South-West Russia settling]. Kiev: tip. G. T. Korchak-Novickogo. 746 s. [in Russian]. 

2. Bantysh-Kamenskij, D. N. (1858). Istochniki malorossijskoj istorii sobrannye D. N. Bantyshem-Kamenskim i izdannye O. Bodyanskim [The sources of Little Russian history assembled by D. N. Bantysh-Kamenskij and published by O. Bodyanski]. Moskva: v univ. tip. Ch. I. 340 s. [in Russian]. 

3. Boyukcolak, А. (2020). Popytki realizacii samostoyatelnoj politiki v Krymskom khanstve nakanune osady Veny v 1683 g. Murad-Girej khan v osmanskoj istoriografii [The attempts of Crimean khans to implement independent policies on the eve of the siege of Vienna in 1683. Murad Giray khan in Ottoman historiography]. Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii Voennaya istoriya: lyudi, sudby, konflikty [Military history: people, fates, conflicts]. SPB GBU DM «Forpost». S. 44-48 [in Russian].

4.  Bogush-Setrencevich, S. (1806). Istoriya carstva Khersonesa Tavricheskogo sochinennaya Stanislavom Sestrincevichem Bogushem [History Khersones Tsardom by S. Sestrincevich-Bogush]. T. 1-2. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. Shnora. 876 s. [in Russian]. 

5. Velyaminov-Zernov, V. V. (1864). Materialy dlya istorii Krymskogo khanstva [The sources for Crimean Khanate history]. Sankt-Peterburg: tip Imp. Akad. nauk. 941 s. [in Russian].

6. .Garkavi, A. (1884). Ya. Otryvki iz istoricheskogo sochineniya Davida Lekhno [The excerpt from Davis Lekno’s historical opus]. Otchet Imperatorskoj Publichnoj Biblioteki za 1882 god [Imperial Public Library report 1882]. SPB: tipografiya V. S. Balasheva. S. 1-41 [in Russian].

7.  Zajcev, I. V. (2008). Zapisi genealogij i pravlenij krymskih khanov i krymskie srednevekovye istoricheskie khroniki [The notes of Crimean khans genealogy and ruling in Crimean chronicles]. Vostok [Oriens]. № 4. S. 29-35 [in Russian].

8. (1996). Kniga puteshestvij Evlii Chelebi. Pokhody s tatarami i puteshestviya po Krymu (1641-1667) [Evlia Çelebi adventure book. Campains with Tatars and travelling in Crimea (1641-1667)]. Simferopol: Tavriya. 240 s. [in Russian].

9. Kırımlı, H. (2020). K voprosu o «Choban Gerayah» v istorii Krymskogo khanstva. [To the issue of Geray’s dynasty in the history of Crimean Khanate]. Voprosy istorii [Questions of history]. № 10 (2). S. 278-288 [in Russian].

10.  Malbahov? B. K. (2002). Kabarda na etapah politicheskoj istorii (seredina XVI – pervaya chetvert XIX veka) [Kabardinian political history (middle of XVI – first half of XIX century]. Moskva: Pomatur. 510 s. [in Russian].

11.  Murzakevich, M. N. (1850). Statejnyj spisok stolnika Vasiliya Tyapkina i dyaka Nikity Zotova, posolstva v Krym v 1680 godu dlya zaklyucheniya Bahchisarajskogo dogovora [Stolnik’s Vasiliy Tyapkin and dyak’s Nikita Zotov list from the Russian piece embassy to the Crimea in 1680]. Odessa: Gorodskaya tipografiya. 284 s. [in Russian].

12.  O predstavlenii dokumentov na dokazatelstvo dvoryanstva Mustafy-agi Machinskogo. Khudozhestvennoe izobrazhenie rodoslovnogo dreva Dervisha Megmet-agi [To the issue of Mustafa-ağa nobility document’s submission and Dervish-ağa genealogy]. GAARK.  F.49, op.1, d. 389, 801 [in Russian].

13.  Pochekaev, R. Yu. (2009). «Sudebnaya reforma» krymskogo khana Murad-Gireya. [Murad Geray «judicial reform»]. Tyurkologicheskij sbornik 2007-2009 [Turcologica 2007-2009]. S. 320-326 [in Russian].

14. (1832).  Seid Muhammed Riza. As-seb-us-sejyar fi ahbar mulyuk-it-tatar. Asseb o-ssejyar, ili Sem planet, soderzhashih istoriyu krymskih khanov ot Mengli-Girej khana I-go do Mengli-Girej khana II-go t.e. s 871/1466 po 1150/1737 g. [As-seb-us-seyyar fi akhbar mulyuk-it-tatar. Asseb" o-sseyyar or Seven planets containing the history of the Crimean khans from Mengli Girey I to Mengli Girey II from 1466 till 1737] Kazan: Tipografiya Kazanskogo universiteta. 572 s. [in Russian].

15.  Sen, D. V. (2013). Diplomaticheskie otnosheniya Krymskogo khanstva i Vojska Donskogo: perepiska Gireev s atamanom S. T. Razinym [Diplomacy between Crimean Khanate and Don Republic. Correspondence between Geray dynasty and S. Razin]. Srednevekovye tyurko-tatarskie gosudarstva [Medieval Turkic-Tatar States]. Vyp. 5. S. 90-97 [in Russian].

16.  Smirnov, V. D. (1887). Krymskoe khanstvo pod verkhovenstvom Osmanskoj Porty do nachala XVIII veka [Crimean Khanate under the Ottoman suzerainty before XVIII century]. Sankt-Peterburg: Univ. tip. v Kazani. 772 s. [in Russian].

17. Solovev, S. M. (1863). Istoriya Rossii s drevnejshih vremen. [History of Russia from Ancient times]. Moskva: izd. Universitetskoj tipografii. T. XIV. 366 s. [in Russian].

18.  Firkovich, A. S. (1856). Sobytiya, sluchivshiesya v Krymu v carstvovanie Shagin-Girej-hana [The incidents happened in Crimea at the times of Şahin Geray]. Vremennik Imperatorskogo Moskovskogo obshestva istorii i drevnostej Rossijskih [Imperial Moskow Historical Society Chronicle]. Kn. 24. Moskva: Universitetskaya tipografiya. S. 101-134 [in Russian].

19.  Khalim Girej Sultan. (2004). Rozovyj kust krymskih khanov ili istoriya Kryma. [The Crimean khans Rosetree or history of the Crimea]. Simferopol: Dolya. 159 s. [in Russian].

20.  Chukhlib, T. V. (2010). Kozaky ta janychary: Ukraina u khrystyiansko-musulmanskykh vijnakh 1500-1700 rr. [Cossack and Yanissary. Ukraine in the wars between Christians and Muslims in 1500-1700]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia. 446 s. [in Ukrainian].

21.  Artanonow, W. (1992). Rosja, Rzeczpospolita і Krym w latach 1686-1699 [Russia, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Crimea]. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis [Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis]. № 14-15. S. 19-46 [in Polish].

22.  Evlia Çelebi. (1928). Seyahatnâmesi [Seyahatnâme]. Istanbul: Devlet Maatbası. C.  VII-VIII. 786 s. [in Turkish].

23.  Hammer-Purgstall, J. (1856). Geschichte der Chane der Krim unter Osmanischer Herrschaft [Crimean Khanate history under Ottoman suzerainty]. Wien: k.k. Hof. und Staatsdruckerei. 258 s. [in German].

24.  Gemil, T. (1984). Relațiile Țărilor Române cu Poarta otomană în documente turcești (1601-1712) [Romanian-Ottoman relations in Ottoman documentation (1601-1712)]. Bucuresti: Direcţia Generală a Arhivelor Statului din Republica Socialistă România. 531 p. [in Romanian].

25.  Kogalniceanu, M. (1874). Cronicile României sau Letopisetele Moldovei si Valahiei. [Romanian Chronicle or Chronicle of Moldova and Wallachia] Bucureşti: Imprimeria Naționalâ, C. N. Rădulescu, Strada Academiei. T. III. 535 p. [in Romanian].

26.  Kołodzejczyk, D. (2011). The Crimean Khanate and Poland Lituania: international diplomacy of the European periphery (15-th – 18-th century) a study of piece treaties followed by an annotated edition of relevant documents. Leiden-Boston: Brill. 1134 p. 

27.  Królikowska-Jedlińska, N. (2019). Law and Division of power in Crimean Khanate (1532-1774); with special refrence to the reign of Murad Giray (1678-1683). Leiden- Boston: Brill. 287 p.

28.  Królikowska-Jedlińska, N. (2019). W poszukiwaniu sojuszników? Rola Chanatu Krymskiego i Persji w polityce Jana III Sobieskiego wobec Imperium Osmańskiego (1674-1696) [In the search of allies. The role of Crimean Khanate and Persia in Jan’s III Turkish policy]. Zeszyty Naukowe Universitety Jagiellońskiego. Prace Historyczne [Research papers of Jagiellonian University: History notebooks]. №  146. Z. 2. S. 331-345 [in Polish].

29. Raşid Mehmed Efendi ve Çelebizade Ismail Asım Efendi. (2013). Tarihi Raşid ve Yezli [Rashid’s history book]. Cilt І-ІІІ. Istanbul: Klasik. 657 s. [in Turkish].

30.  Sılahdâr Fındıklı Mehmed-ağa. (1928). Silahdâr Tarihi. [Silahdâr history book] Istanbul: Devlet Maatbası. 763 s. [in Turkish].

31.  Stosunki dyplomatyczne Rzeczypospolitej z chanatem Tatarów krymskich: korespondencja wymieniana między królami polskimi i chanami, traktaty polsko-tatarskie, korespondencja wymienina między dyplomatami i dostojnikami polskimi i tatarskimi [Polish-Crimean diplomacy, correspondence between the kings and khans: embassy materials]. AGAD. K. 60. T. 25. № 25 [in Polish].

32.  Tarihi Mehmed Giray. (2006) [Mehmed Geray history book] Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 190 s. [in Turkish].

33.  Wójcik, Z. (1959) Traktat andruszowski 1667 roku i jego geneza [Truce of Andrusovo and its background]. Warszawa: Państwowe wydawnictwo naukowe. 284 s. [in Polish].

34. Yaşa, F. (2019) 17. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında Kırım Hanlığı'nda iaşe, değişen fiyatlar ve. topluma etkisi [Diet, price inflation and social changes at the Crimean Khanate in XVII century]. Üçüncü Iktisat tarihi kongresi bildirileri [Results of III Economic History Congress]. (Izmir, 26-27 nisan 2019)/ Cilt I. Izmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi. S. 139-150 [in Turkish].